«Абдуллин, А. И. Право интеллектуальной собственности в Европейском Союзе: генезис, унификация, перспективы развития ВВЕДЕНИЕ.4 РАЗДЕЛ I. ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЙ СОЮЗ И ПРОБЛЕМА УНИФИКАЦИИ И ГАРМОНИЗАЦИИ ПРАВОВОЙ ОХРАНЫ ...»

554. Govaere I. The Use and Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights in EC Law.-London: SWEET and MAXWELL, 1996.- 327 p.

555. Graaf van de E.S. Patent Law and Modern Biotechnology: A Comparative Study about the Requirements and the Scope of Protection.- Sanders Institute; Gouda Quint, 1997.- 447 p.

556. Greaves R. The Herchel Smith Lecture 1998: Article 86 of the E.C. Treaty and Intellectual Property Rights // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 10.- P. 379-385.

557. Gringras C. The Laws of the Internet.- Butterworths, 1997.- 399 p.

558. Grote R. Aspects juridiques de la bioethique dans la 16gislation allemande // Revue internationale de droit сотраг,- 1999.- № 1.- P. 85 106.

559. Groves P., Martino A., Miskin C., Richards J. Intellectual Property and the Internal Market of the European Community.- London, 1993.- 266 p.

560. Guedon J.- C. The Communication Highway and Academic Publishing // The Electronic Superhighway: The Shape of Technology and Law to Come / Ed. by E.Mackaay, D.Poulin, P.Trudel.- L; The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1995.- P. 69 89.

561. Hails R.L.Jr. Liability of On-line Service Providers Resulting from Copyright Infringement Performed by their Subscribers // European Intellectual Property Review.-1996.-№5.-P. 304-306.

562. Harmonisation in the EEC / Ed. by C.C.Twitchett.- London: The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1981.- 144 p.

563. Hart M. The Proposed Directive for Copyright in the Information Society: Nice Rights, Shame about the Exceptions // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.-№5.-P. 169-171.

564. Hassan S. Patents and Related Rights in Italy Some Changes in Court Proceedings // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1998,- № 3.-Vol. 29.- P. 283 Hays Th., Hansen P. Silhouette is Not the Proper Case Upon Which to Decide the Parallel Importation Question // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 7.- P. 277-279.

566. Heide Th. The Berne Three-Step Test and Proposed Copyright Directive // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999.- № 3.- P. 105 109.

567. Heifer L.R. A European Human Rights Analogy for Adjudicating Copyright Claims Under TRIPs // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999.- № 1.- P. 8 16.

568. Hellstadius A., Meier-Ewert W. Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Intellectual Property Matters Perspectives for the Future (EU and World-Wide) // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 2005.- № 3.- P. 313 - 335.

569. Henderson E. TRIPs and the Third World: the Example of Pharmaceutical Patents in India// European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 11.- P. 651 655.

570. Henning-Bodewig F., Ruijsenaars H.E. Alternative Protection for Product Designs A Comparative view of German, Benelux and US Law // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1992.- Vol. 23,- P. 643 - 669.

571. Hilty R.M. Intellectual Property and the European Community's Internal Market Legislation Copyright in the Internal Market // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 2004.- № 7.- P. 760 - 775.

572. Hoeren Th., Decker U. Electronic Archives and the Press: Copyright Problems of Mass Media in the Digital Age // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 7.-P. 256-266.

573. Hollyoak J., Torremans P. Intellectual Property Law.- London: Butterworths, 1995.- 489 p.

574. Horton A. The Community Trade Mark Regulation // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1994.- № 2.- Supplement 1.

575. Houben P.H. Les Conseils des ministres des Communautes europeennes.-Leyden, 1964.- P.

87.

576. Hughes J., Weightman E. EC Databases Protection: Fine Tuning the Commission's Proposal // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1992,- № 5.- P. 147 -151.

577. Hughes S. Droit de Suite: A Critical Analysis of the Approved Directive // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 12.- P. 694 700.

578. Hurdle H. Domain Names -The Scope of a Trade Mark Proprietor's Monopoly Avnet Inc. v.

Isoact Ltd // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 2,- P. 74 -76.

579. Huydecoper T. Keeping Up Appearances // Intellectual Property and Information Law:

Essays in Honour of Herman Cohen Jehoram / Ed. by Jan J.C.Kabel and Gerard J.H.M.Mom.- L;

The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1998.- P. 275 281.

580. Intellectual Property and Information Law: Essays in Honour of Herman Cohen Jehoram / Ed. by Jan J.C.Kabel and Gerard J.H.M.Mom.- L; The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1998.- 350 p.

581. Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas / Ed. by A.D.Moore.- N.Y., 1997.- 387 p.

582. Ipsen H.P. Festschrift fur C.F.Ophuls.- Karlsruhe, 1965.- S. 70 71.

583. John S. What Rights Do Record Companies Have on the Information Superhighway // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 2.- P. 74 78.

584. Johnston G. Copyright and Freedom of the Media: A Modest Proposal // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 1.- P. 6 17.

585. Jones L. An Artist's Entry into Cyberspace: Intellectual Property on the Internet // European Intellectual Property Review.- 2000.- № 2.- P. 79 92.

586. Jones N. The New Draft Biotechnology Directive // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 6.- P. 363 365.

587. Jones N., Britton I. Biotech Patents The Trend Reversed Again: Chiron v Murex (Hepatitis С Virus) in the Court of Appeal // European Intellectual Property Review.-1996.-№3.- P. 171Jones S. A Child's First Steps: The First Six Months of Operation The ICANN Dispute Resolution Procedure for Bad Faith Registration of Domain Names // European Intellectual Property Review.- 2001,- № 2.- P. 66 - 78.

589. Jongen H.D.J., Meijboom A.P. Copyright Software Protection in the EC.- De-venter:

Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1993.

590. Jooris E. Infringement of Foreign Copyright and the Jurisdiction of English Courts // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 3.- P. 127 129.

591. Josselin-Gall M. La Directive 96/9/CE du Parlement еигореп et du Conseil du 11 mars 1996 concernant la protection juridique des bases de donnees: Presentation generate // Revue critique du droit international ргпг.- 1996.- № 3 (85).- P. 526 537.

592. Julia-Barcelo R. Liability For On-line Intermediaries: A European Perspective //European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 12.- P. 453-463.

593. Julia-Barcelo R. On-line Intermediary Liability Issues: Comparing E.U. and U.S. Legal Frameworks // European Intellectual Property Review.- 2000.- № 3.- P. 105 -119.

594. Kapteyn P.J.G., VerLoren van Themaat P. Introduction to the Law of the European Communities.- third edition.- L; The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1998.- 1447 p.

595. Karet I. Delivering the Goods? The House of Lords' Decision in Biogen v. Medeva// European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997,- № 1.- P. 21 26.

596. Karet I. Over-broad Patent Claims: An Inventive Step by the EPO // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 10.- P. 561 563.

597. Katzenberger P. The Droit de Suite in Copyright Law // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1973.- № 4.- P. 361 377.

598. Kelleher D. Shareware Licences for Software // European Intellectual Property Review.P. 140 142.

599. Kern M. Patentability of Biotechnological Inventions in the United Kingdom: The House of Lords Charts the Course // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.Vol. 29.- P. 247 282.

600. Khlestov N. WTO-WIPO Co-operation: Does it Have a Future? // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997,- № 10.- P. 560 562.

601. Kinderlerer J., Longley D. Human Genetics: The New Panacea? // The Modern Law Review.- 1998.- Vol. 61.- № 5.- P. 603 620.

602. Kingston W. The Case for Compulsory Arbitration: Empirical Evidence European Intellectual Property Review.- 2000.- № 4.- P. 154 158.

603. Kjeldgaard R.H., Marsh D.R. Recent Developments in the Patent Protection of Plant-based Technology in the United States // European Intellectual Property Review.1997.-№ 1,- P. 16-20.

604. Knopf H.P. Copyright and the Internet in Canada and Beyond: Convergence, Vision and Division // European Intellectual Property Review.- 2000.- № 6.- P. 262 271.

605. Kobia R. Reflections on the Effects of Future Enlargements of the E.U. on Industrial Property : The Case of Trade Marks // European Intellectual Property Review.1998.-№5.-P. 183Koelman K.J. A Hard Nut to Crack: The Protection of Technological Measures // European Intellectual Property Review.- 2000.- № 6,- P. 272 288.

607. Koelman K.J. Copyright Law and Economics in the EU Copyright Directive: Is the Droit d'Auteur Passe? // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 2004.- № 6.P. 603 638.

608. Kohler C., Burmeister K. Copyright Liability on the Internet Today in Europe (Germany, France, Italy and the E.U.) // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999.- № 10.-P. 485-499.

609. Korah V. The Limitations of Copyright and Patents by the Rules for the Free Movement of Goods in the European Common Market // Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law.P. 9 -10.

610. Koumantos G. La nouvelle loi hellenique sur le droit d'auteur et les droits voisins // Revue international du droit d'auteur.- 1994.- № 1.- P. 205 210.

611. Koumantos G. Les bases de donnees dans la directive communautaire // Revue international du droit d'auteur.- 1997.- № 1 (171).- P. 79 136.

612. Kroker E.R. The Computer Directive and the Balance of Rights // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997,- № 5.- P. 247 250.

613. Kunze F.G. The Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks as Applied under the Protocol // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1994.- № 6.- P. 223 -225.

614. Kur A. The Green Paper's 'Design Approach' What's Wrong with It? // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1993.- Vol. 15.- P. 376 - 377.

615. Kurlantzick L. Harmonisation of Copyright Protection // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1994,- № 11,- P. 463 464.

616. Laddie H., Prescott P., Victoria M. The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs.- T.l, 2.London: Butterworths, 1995.

617. Lai S. Database Protection in the United Kingdom: The New Deal and its Effects on Software Protection // European Intellectual Property Review,- 1998,- № 1,- P. 32 -35.

618. Lai S. Digital Copyright and Watermarking // European Intellectual Property Review.P. 171 175.

619. Lai S. The Impact of the Recent WIPO Copyright Treaty and Other Initiatives on Software Copyright in the United Kingdom // Intellectual Property Quarterly.- 1998.- № 1.- P. 35- 55.

620. Le genie ge^tique Biotechnology and Patent Law. Travaux de la journee d'etude du 28 mars 1995, edites par F.Dessemontet.- Lausanne: Centre du droit de l'entreprise de l'Universite de Lausanne, 1996.- 208 p. (Publication CEDIDAC № 31).

621. Lehman M. The European Database Directive and Its Implementation into German Law // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1998.- № 7.-Vol. 29.-P. 776Lehman M., Tapper C.F. A Handbook of European Software Law.- L., 1993.

623. Lesser W. Sustainable Use of Genetic Resources under the Convention on Biological Diversity.- CAB International, 1997.- 218 p.

624. Lewinski von S. A Successful Step towards Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Age: The New E.C. Proposal for a Harmonisation Directive // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 4.- P. 135 139.

625. Lewinski von S. The WIPO Diplomatic Conference on Audiovisual Performances: A First Resume // European Intellectual Property Review.- 2001.- № 7,- P. 333 -343.

626. Lewinski von S. WIPO Diplomatic Conference Results in Two New Treaties // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1997.- № 2,- Vol. 28,- P. 203Lindner B. News on the Internet: Legal Implications of Union Syndicale des Journalistes Fran^sais CFDT v. Ste Plurimedia // European Intellectual Property Review.-1998.-№ 11.- P.

410-413.

628. Llewelyn M. The Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions: An Alternative Approach // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 3.- P. 115 127.

629. Llewelyn M. The Patentability of Biological Material: Continuing Contradiction and Confusion // European Intellectual Property Review.- 2000.- Vol. 22.- № 5.- P. 191 -197.

630. Locus J.-K. The Community Legal Order.- Brussels, 1990.- P. 89.

631. Loewenheim U. Multimedia and the European Copyright Law // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1996.- № 1.- Vol. 27.- P. 41 52.

632. Lucas A., Lucas H.-Y. Traite de la propriete litteraire et artistique.- Paris, 1994.- 1104 p.

633. Macmillan F., Blakeney M. The Internet and Communications Carrier's Copyright Liability // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998,- № 2.- P. 52 61.

634. MacQueen H.L. Copyright, Competition and Industrial Design.- Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995.- Ill p.

635. Magnier V. Les efforts d'adaptation du droit d'auteur americain aux oeuvres issues des nouvelles technologies de Г information // Revue de droit international et de droit compare.Tome LXXVII.- P. 7 55.

636. Mangini V. Modelli industriali e disegni ornamentali // Volume XX della Enciclopedia Giuridica.- Roma, 1990.

637. Marks D.S., Turnbull B.H. Technical Protection Measures: The Intersection of Technology, Law and Commercial Licences // European Intellectual Property Review.-2000.-№5.- P. 198Mason A. Developments in the Law of Copyright and Public Access to Information // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- №11. p. 636 643.

639. Mattera A. La libre circulation des oeuvres d'art h Tinterieur de la Commun-aute et la protection des tresors nationaux ayant une valeur artistique, historique ou archeologique // Revue du marche unique europeen.- 1993.- Vol. 9.- P. 16 -17.

640. McCormick J. The Effect of TRIPs in the Field of Design Right: Re Azrak Hamway International Inc. // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 4.- P. 205 -207.

641. Mclnerney A. Biotechnology: Biogen v. Medeva in the House of Lords // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 1- P. 14 21.

642. McLean Sh.A.M. Interventions in the Human Genome // The Modern Law Review.- 1998.Vol. 61.- № 5.- P. 681 696.

643. Meyer-Rochow R. The Application of Passing Off as a Remedy Against Domain Name Piracy // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 11- P. 405 409.

644. Mille A. Copyright in the Cyberspace Era // European Intellectual Property Review.-1991.P. 570 577.

645. Minoudis M.G. Well-known Trade Marks: A Greek Aspect 11 European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 3.- P. 149 -151.

646. Momberg D. The "Entrapped" Trade Mark // European Intellectual Property Review.P. 65 67.

647. Morton J. Data Protection and Privacy // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 10.- P. 558 561.

648. Mostert F. (ed.). Famous and Well-known Marks.- London: Butterworths, 1st ed., 1997.p.

649. Muenchinger N.E. French Law and Practice Concerning Multimedia and Telecommunications // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- Vol. 18.- № 4.- P. 186Muir I., Brandi-Dohrn M., Gruber S. European Patent Law: Law and Procedure under the EPC and PCT.- Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.- 316 p.

651. Musker D. Community Design Law: Principles and Practice.- London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2002.

652. Newman J. The Patentability of Computer-related Inventions in Europe // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 12.- P. 701 708.

653. Nimmer D. US Should Extend Copyright Terms // Billboard.- 1994.- 16 April.- P. 8.

654. Nott R. "You Did It": The European Biotechnology Directive At Last // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998,- Vol. 20.- № 9.- P. 347 351.

655. Nutzi P. Intellectual Property Arbitration // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.Vol. 19,- № 4.- P. 192 197.

656. Oliver P. Free Movement of Goods in the European Community.- 3rd edition.-London:

Sweet and Maxwell, 1996.- 455 p.

657. Ophuls C.F. Le probleme des dispositions directemant applicables des traites internationaux et son application aux trait6s instituant les Communautes.- Zwolle, 1966.- P. 6.

658. Oser A. Patenting (Partial) Gene Sequences Taking Particular Account of the EST Issue // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1999.- № 1.-Vol. 30.- P. 1 -18.

659. Overwalle van G. Patentability of Biotechnological Inventions: A Comparative Study.Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1996.- 745 p.

660. Overwalle van G. The Legal Protection of Biological Material in Belgium // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 2000.- № 3.- Vol. 31.- P. 259 284.

661. Overwalle van G. The Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions in Europe and in the United States.- Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1997.- 78 p.

662. Pagenberg J. The Exhaustion Principle and "Silhouette" Case // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1999.- № 1.- Vol. 30.- P. 19 21.

663. Parr N. Avoiding Antitrust Pitfalls in Drafting and Enforcing Intellectual Property Agreements in the European Union // European Intellectual Property Review.1997.- № 2.- P. 50.

664. Patent Law, Ethics and Biotechnology / G. Van Overwalle (ed.).- Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1998.- 183 p.

665. Pattison M. The European Commission's Proposal on the Protection of Computer Databases // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1992,- № 4.- P. 113 115.

666. Peace N., Christie A. Intellectual Property Protection for the Products of Animal Breeding // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 4.- P. 213 233.

667. Penneau J. Protection de la personne dans le domaine de la recherche n^dicale // Revue internationale de droit compare.- 1998.- № 2.- P. 383 399.

668. Perot-Morel M.-A. Specific Protection of Designs and its Relation to the Protection by Copyright in French Law // Design Protection / Ed. H.Cohen Jehoram.- Leyden, 1976.-P. 45-65.

669. Phillips J. Analysis: Pariah, Pirahna or Partner? The New View of Intellectual Property in Europe // Intellectual Property Quarterly.- 1998.- № 1.- P. 107 -112.

670. Pickering C.D.G. Trade Marks in Theory and Practice.- Oxford: HART Publishing, 1998.p.

671. Pinckaers J.C.S. From Privacy Toward a New Intellectual Property Right in Persona.- The Hague, London, Boston : Kluwer Law International, 1996,- 490 p.

672. Pollaud-Dulian F. Le droit de destination. Le sort des exemplaires en droit d'auteur.- Paris, 1989.

673. Pottage A. The Inscription of Life: Genes, Patents, and Bio-politics // The Modern Law Review.- 1998.- Vol. 61.- № 5.- P. 740 765.

674. Power T. Digitisation of Serials and Publications: The Seminal Objective of Copyright Law // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 8.- P. 444 461.

675. Prechal A. Directives in European Community Law: A Study on EC Directives and their Enforcement by National Courts.- Amsterdam, 1995.- 416 p.

676. Press L. Two Cultures, The Internet and Interactive TV // The Electronic Superhighway:

The Shape of Technology and Law to Come / Ed. by E.Mackaay, D.Poulin, P.Trudel.- L; The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1995,- P. 21 35.

677. Pretnar B. Is the Future Enlargement of the European Union an Immediate Issue for the Community Trade Mark System? // European Intellectual Property Review.-1997.-№4,- P. 185Proposal of the Max Planck Institute for a European Design Law // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1991.- Vol. 22.- P. 523 527.

679. Quinn M., Macgowan N. Could Article 30 Impose Obligations on Individuals //European Law Review.- 1987.- Vol. 12,- P. 163 169.

680. Radcliffe M.F. On-Line Rights: How to Interpret Pre-Existing Agreements // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 9,- P. 494 498.

681. Raden van L. Technology Dematerialised: Another Approach to Information-related Inventions // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 7.- P. 384 389.

682. Raff K. No Protection for Fruits of Research under the Supplementary Protection Certificate Scheme // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 9.- P. 508 -510.

683. Rasmussen J. The Principle of Exhaustion of Trade Mark Rights Pursuant to Directive 89/104 (and Regulation 40/94) // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1995.-№ 4.- P. 177.

684. Raubenheimer A. Implementation of the EC Software Directive in Germany -Special Provisions for Protection of Computer Programs // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1996.- № 5.- Vol. 27.- P. 609 648.

685. Raubenheimer A. The Possible Effects of EU Directives on Relations Between Individuals // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.1997.- № 2.- Vol. 28.- P. 203.

686. Reinbothe J., Lewinski von S. The EC Directive on Rental and Lending Rights and on Piracy.- London: SWEET and MAXWELL, 1993.

687. Reinbothe J., Martin-Prat M., Lewinski von S. The New WIPO Treaties: A First Resume // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 4,- P. 171 -184.

688. Richardson M. Intellectual Property Protection and the Internet // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 12.- P. 669 671.

689. Roberts T. Patenting Plants Around the World // European Intellectual Property Review.P. 531 536.

690. Rodger L., Finn M. Recent Patent Litigation Developments: Privileged Documents and Pleading Prior Disclosures and Users: VISX Incorporated v. Nidek Company Ltd // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999,- № 2,- P. 94 97.

691. Rose D. The European Union Trade Barrier Regulation: An Effective Instrument for Promoting Global Harmonisation of Intellectual Property Rights? // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999.- № 6.- P. 313 320.

692. Rudden В., Wyatt D. Basic Community Laws.- 5th edition.- Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.-612 p.

693. Rumphorst W. Fine-tuning Copyright for the Information Society // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 2.- P. 79 82.

694. Samuelson P., Opsahl K. Licensing Information in the Global Information Market: Freedom of Contract Meets Public Policy // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999.- № 8.- P. 397.

695. Schaefer M., Rasch C., Braun Th. Liability of On-line Service and Access Providers for Copyright Infringing Third-Party Contents // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999.- № 4.- P. 208 211.

696. Schatz U. Patentability of Genetic Engineering Inventions in European Patent Office Practice // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law 1998.-№ 1.-Vol. 28.P. 2- 16.

697. Shea N. Does the First Trade Marks Directive Allow International Exhaustion of Rights? // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1995.- № 10.- P. 463 465.

698. Schermers H.G., Blokker N.M. International Institutional Law.- 3rd edn.- The Hague, 1995.

699. Schippan M. Purchase and Licensing of Digital Rights: The VERDI Project and the Clearing of Multimedia Rights in Europe // European Intellectual Property Review.-2000.-№ 1.P. 24-29.

700. Schnitzer A.F. De la diversite et de Г unification du droit: aspects juridiques et sociologique.-Geneve, 1946.- Ill p.

701. Schoning P. Internet and the Applicable Copyright Law: A Scandinavian Perspective // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999.- № 2.- P. 45 52.

702. Scheming P. The New Copyright Act in Denmark // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law1996,- № 4.- Vol. 27.- P. 470 476.

703. Schrell A. Are Plants (Still) Patentable? Plant Genetic Systems (EPO Decision T356/93) // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996,- № 4.- P. 242 244.

704. Schricker G. Harmonization of Copyright in the European Economic Community // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1989.- № 4.-Vol. 20.-P. 466Schwarts I.E. Festschrift fur Walter Halstein.- Frankfurt-a.M., 1966.- S. 506.

706. Schwarz M. Claim Interpretation in US Patent Litigation: The US Supreme Court's Decision in Markman v Westview Instruments // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.P. 502 506.

707. Scott A. The Dutch Challenge to the Bio-Patenting Directive // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999.- № 4.- P. 212 215.

708. Sell S.K. Power and Ideas. North-South Politics of Intellectual Property and Antitrust.State University Press of New-York, 1998.- 289 p.

709. Shaw M.N. International Law.- Fourth edition.- Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.- 939 p.

710. Sherman В., Bently L. The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law: The British Experience, 1760 -1911.- Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.- 242 p.

711. Sinclair M. Fair is not always Fair: Media Monitors and Copyright // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997,- № 4.- P. 188 -191.

712. Slot P.J. Harmonisation // European Law Review.- 1996.- Vol. 21.- October.-P. 378-397.

713. Smith R.G. Broadcasting Law and Fundamental Rights.- Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.p.

714. Sources and Categories of European Union Law: A Comparative and Reform Perspective / Ed. by G. Winter.- Baden-Baden, 1996.- 688 p.

715. Stamatoudi LA. The European Court's Love-Hate Relationship with Collecting Societies // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 6.- P. 289 297.

716. Stanley J., Ince D.C. Copyright Law in Biotechnology: A View from the Formalist Camp // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 3.- P. 142 148.

717. Stephens-Ofher J. The Boards of Appeal: Policemen or Umpires? // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 4.- P. 167 170.

718. Sterckx S. Some Ethically Problematic Aspects of the Proposal for a Directive on the Legal Protection of Biotechnological Inventions // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 4.- P. 123 -128.

719. Sterling J.A.L. The International Copyright Code and E-Justice: Basic Proposals for Global Solutions to Global Problems // European Intellectual Property Review.-2001.-№ 11.-P. 528The British Copyright Council Submission to the European Commission: Digital Technology in the Field of Copyright and Related Rights // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 1.- P. 52 55.

721. The Electronic Superhighway: The Shape of Technology and Law to Come / Ed. by E.Mackaay, D.Poulin, P.Trudel.- L; The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International,1995.- 193 p.

722. The European Union after Amsterdam: A Legal Analyis / Ed. by T.Heukels, N.Blokker, M.Brus.- L; The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1998.- 335 p.

723. The Green Paper on the Legal Protection of Industrial Design / Ed. F.Gotzen.-Brussels:

Story Scientia, 1992.- P. 87 106.

724. The Role and Future of the European Court of Justice / Ed. by S.Hadley.-London, 1996.p.

725. Thomson J. The Grey Penumbra of Interpretation Surrounding the Obviousness Test for Biotech Patents // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 2.- P. 90 -96.

726. Thome C., Bennett S. Domain Names Internet Warehousing: Has Protection of Well-known Names on the Internet Gone Too Far? // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 12,P. 468 - 470.

727. Thums D. Patent Protection for Medical Treatment A Distinction Between Patent and Medical Law // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.1996,- № 4.Vol. 27.- P. 423 447.

728. Towards a European Civil Code / A.Hartkamp, M.Hesselink, E.Hondius, CJoustra, E. du Perron (ed.).- Second and Revised Ed.- L; The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International;

Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri, 1998.- 652 p.

729. Tritton G. Intellectual Property in Europe.- London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1996.- 803 p.

730. Turk S.A. The Most Important 21st Century Intellectual Property Issue // Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property.- 2005.- № 4.- P. 153 155.

731. Vad Lane-Rowley U. Using Design Protection in the Fashion and Textile Industry.-Wiley, 1997.- 190 p.

732. Verloren van Themaat P. Precisions sur la portee de Г Article 36 par rapport a Г Article du Traite de la CEE concernant des contrats de licence de brevets // S.E.W.-1964.-P. 83.

733. Verma S.K. TRIPS Development and Transfer of Technology // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1996.- № 3.- Vol. 27.- P. 331 -364.

734. Vignes D. The Harmonisation of National Legislation and the EEC // European Law Review.- 1990.- Vol. 15.- P. 358 361.

735. Vinje T. Copyright Imperilled? // European Intellectual Property Review.-1999.- № 4.- P.

192 207.

736. Vinje T.C. A Brave New World of Technical Protection Systems: Will There Still Be Room For Copyright? // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 8.- P. 431 -440.

737. Vinje T.C. All's Not Quiet on the Berne Front // European Intellectual Property Review.P. 585 589.

738. Vinje T.C. Harmonizing Intellectual Property Laws in the European Union: Past, Present and Future // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1995.- № 8.- P. 361 -377.

739. Vinje T.C. The New WIPO Copyright Treaty: A Happy Result in Geneva // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- № 5.- P. 230 236.

740. Virally M. Definition and Classification of International Organizations: a Legal Approach // The Concept of International Organization / Ed. by G.Abi-Saab.- L., 1981.-P.51 -55.

741. Waage E. Protection Against Irrevocable Loss of Rights and Principles of Good Faith in European Patent Law // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1998.Vol. 29.- P. 641 645.

742. Wadlow Ch. Intellectual Property and the Rome Contracts Convention // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1997.- Vol. 19.- № 1.- P. 11 -15.

743. Wagner A, Infringing Trade Marks: Function, Association and Confusion of Signs According to the E.C. Trade Marks Directive // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999.Vol. 21.- № 3.- P. 127 129.

744. Wallace W. Protection for Designs in the United Kingdom // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1974.- Vol. 5.- P. 421 423.

745. Warren A. A Mouse in Sheep's Clothing: The Challenge to the Patent Morality Criterion Posed by "Dolly" // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1998.- № 12.- P. 445 452.

746. Watkin Т., Rau A. Intellectual Property in Artificial Neural Networks In Particular Under the European Patent Convention // International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law.- 1996.- № 4.- Vol. 27.- P. 447 - 469.

747. Watts J. Trade Marks for the Shape of Goods // European Intellectual Property Review.P. 147 149.

748. Weatherall K. An End to Private Communications in Copyright? The Expansion of Rights to Communicate Works to the Public // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1999.- № 7.- P.

342 353; № 8.- P. 398 - 409.

749. White A. W. Whither the Pharmaceutical Trade Mark? // European Intellectual Property Review.- 1996.- № 8.- P. 441 443.

750. White E. In Search of the Limits to Article 30 of the EEC Treaty // Common Market Law Review.- 1989.- Vol. 26.- P. 235 265.

751. White N.D. The Law of International Organisations.- Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996.- 285 p.

752. Wienand P. Copyright Term Harmonisation in the European Union // Copyright World.May.- P. 24 27.

753. Willems J.J. The EPC: The Emperor's Phantom Clothes? A Blueprint Instead of a Green Paper // Intellectual Property Quarterly.- 1998.- № 1.- P. 1-16.